Jacob McCown
Research Proposal
Prof. Begert
10/26/14
Intro:
Nowadays businesses
are focusing more attention on reaching customers via the internet as opposed
to to using the more traditional tactics, such as customers phone numbers and
home address. Businesses do this with
the assumption that they are saving money and reaching more people in a faster
and more positive way. However some
still stand firmly behind the traditional methods believing that the customers
respond better to the traditional ways and that the newer ways can be too
invasive in some instances.
This paper will
reflect the findings on ample research
about this topic. It will look at which
forms of marketing is truly more effective, which is cheaper, whether or not some of the methods used now
are too invasive or creepy, and over all which is preferred by customers in
this day and age. It may be that people
are becoming a little more use to what in previous generations would be call ed
breaches in privacy, and are actually responding well to the new and more
invasive tactics.
Review of Literature:
There has already been
much research done for this paper and there will be more. So far, some of the more helpful sources
looked at have been on the study of “geofencing”. There is a good sized following of this
subject and in one respected trade journal,
Location-Based Social Networking and Services 1st Edition by
Roman Espejo, there is multiple articles on the subject and this paper will
look at at least three of them. Each of the
articles show different sides of the argument and provide this paper with
different perspectives that can each be verified. The articles I will be looking at are
"Retailers May Benefit from Geofencing", "Location-Based Social
Networking Is Not Attracting Many Users", and "Geofencing Can Be an
Invasion of Privacy". Another
source that was reviewed was an article written by Lori Chordas that was
published in Best's Review, it goes in to detail on ways companies are
advertising on social media cites like Facebook and LinkedIn. A fifth source I looked at was an article
called "Dissimilarity of E-Marketing VS Traditional Marketing" that
was authored by Mehrdad Salehi and published in the International Journal of
Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences2.1, this article is useful because it plainly
compares some traditional methods such as ads in magazines to some newer ones
like E-mail.
Plan to Collect Information:
So far I have mainly
used Online Databases like ProQuest and Opposing Viewpoints to
find sources. I use these databases
because they can direct me to scholarly journals that I can then, through
search engines, gain direct access to and check if they have been peer reviewed
for myself. I find that theses databases
can be very helpful and provide me with credible sources that I can even check
for myself.
I plan on delving
deeper into the medias views on this subject and try to find a couple news
article to aid in my research. I think that checking for modern news articles
on the newer methods of marketing will really help add new viewpoints to my
research and also keep this paper as up
to date as possible. I also plan on
continuing to sift through Online Databases in hopes to find more credible peer
reviewed sources to further my research.
Project Time-line:
This coming week will
be spent looking for news articles and recently published viewpoints to help
make my stand on the final paper as modern and well rounded as possible. I plan on searching the internet for the articles
but I am considering talking to some people I know who have made there life's
earnings through business ventures, some who have used traditional marketing
and some, like my father, who has experience in the modern tactics. I hope that by next week I will have at least
the 10 of the 20 sources that are required.
The week after that will be spent solely focusing on the 10 peer
reviewed sources. I plan on checking the
OC Brem library for a few of them. I
have used Bremerton's library before and am pretty knowledgeable on what I am
looking for and where to look, but I also want to peek in to the Kitsap
Regional Library to see what it has to offer.
By November 4th I will have all of my sources put together
and well annotated. Also I plan to have already started on the structure of the
actual paper using guidelines I have learned in previous English classes and
this class. By the time I have completed
that step which is a crude and basic outline I will be ready to start a rough
draft. From there I will follow the
course syllabus and refine my paper till the day it is due. I will refine it by sending the rough draft
to my old English teacher who I still keep in touch with and has helped me with
such things in the past, and by doing what I always do and giving the paper to
my father for final grammar and spelling checks.
Working Bibliography:
Alliance Data. "Retailers May Benefit from Geofencing."Location-Based
Social Networking and Services.
Ed. Roman Espejo. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2014. At Issue. Rpt. from "Mastering Mobility:
Making the Most of Geofencing Technology." 2013. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.
Chordas, Lori. "Three-Dimensional Marketing." Best's
Review.9 (2014): 28-33. ProQuest. Web.
7 Oct. 2014.
Hill, Sidney. "Location-Based Social Networking Is Not Attracting
Many Users."Location- Based Social
Networking and Services. Ed. Roman Espejo. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2014. At Issue. Rpt. from
"Location-Based Services Are Becoming Social
Network Outcasts." TechNewsWorld. 2011. Opposing Viewpoints in
Context. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.
Heavey, Susan, and Lisa Richwine. "Aggressive Pharmaceutical
Marketing Practices Often Outpace
Regulatory Efforts.” The Pharmaceutical Industry. Ed. Roman Espejo.
Detroit: Greenhaven Press,
2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Outgunned FDA Tries to Get Tough with Drug Ads." Reuters.
2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.
Salehi, Mehrdad, et al. "Dissimilarity of E-Marketing VS
Traditional Marketing." International Journal
of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences2.1 (2012): 510-5. ProQuest. Web. 7 Oct. 2014.
Silk, Matt. "Geofencing Can Be an Invasion of Privacy." Location-Based Social Networking and Services. Ed. Roman Espejo.
Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2014. At Issue. Rpt. from "Some Privacy Ground Rules For
Location-Based Marketing: Why 'Geofencing'
Goes Too Far." beckmedia.net.
2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context.
Web.
28 Oct. 2014.